AI Tool Risk Directory
Is that AI tool safe for work?
Before your team uses an AI tool at work, know how it treats your data. We rate 22 popular tools for default at-work use: whether they train on your inputs, how long they keep data, and which certifications they hold. Everything is sourced from the vendor's own policies.
Facts compiled 2026-06-18. Always confirm against the linked source before relying on a fact.
22 of 22 tools
Adobe Inc. · Image
The bigger governance question is output provenance and indemnity scope rather than training. Firefly is 'commercially safe' and IP-indemnified mainly for enterprise customers, so individual and free users should not assume the same legal coverage for generated assets.
Canva Pty Ltd · Design
There is a genuine discrepancy between Canva's stated opt-in default and third-party reports of training toggles being on by default for Free/Pro accounts, so an at-work individual user should explicitly verify and disable both 'usage' and 'content' AI-training toggles in privacy settings.
OpenAI · AI assistants
Consumer/free ChatGPT uses your chats for training unless you proactively disable it, so staff pasting work data into personal accounts can leak it into model improvement.
Anthropic · AI assistants
Even when a consumer opts out of training, conversations flagged for safety review can still be retained up to two years and used to improve models without notifying the user.
Anysphere · Coding
On the free/Pro tier Privacy Mode is opt-in and OFF by default, so an at-work user who does not enable it has their code, prompts and editor actions stored and used to train Cursor's models.
DeepSeek (Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence) · AI assistants
The hosted DeepSeek app and API store user prompts and personal data on servers in the People's Republic of China (subject to Chinese law) and use inputs to train models by default. This is a major governance risk that has led to government bans and restrictions in Italy, South Korea, Australia, and multiple US federal agencies.
ElevenLabs Inc. · Audio
On the default consumer tier your submitted audio/voice data is used to improve models unless you flip the opt-out toggle, and voice cloning carries real consent/likeness-misuse exposure if someone uploads a voice they aren't authorized to clone.
Fireflies.ai Corp. · Meetings & notetakers
Fireflies' bot auto-joins calendar meetings to record/transcribe, creating consent exposure, and HIPAA-grade Private Storage plus EU data hosting are gated to Enterprise deals.
Gamma Tech, Inc. · Design
On individual Free/Plus plans your presentation content is fed into AI model improvement by default, so an at-work user must manually opt out (or move to a Team/Business workspace) to keep client material out of training.
GitHub (Microsoft) · Coding
On individual (free/Pro) plans, code snippets can be retained and used for model improvement unless opted out, so developers on personal accounts may expose proprietary code.
Google · AI assistants
Personal Gemini accounts have human reviewers reading a sample of chats (kept up to 3 years even after you delete activity), so confidential work content typed into a personal account can be seen by reviewers.
Grammarly, Inc. · Writing
On free/Premium consumer tiers Grammarly uses de-identified content for product improvement/training unless you opt out, and HIPAA coverage requires an Enterprise BAA (not available on Free/Premium/Business).
Jasper AI, Inc. · Writing
Jasper relies on third-party LLM providers (e.g., OpenAI/Anthropic) under no-training API agreements, so an at-work user's confidential prompts still transit external model vendors and trust rests on contractual rather than self-hosted controls.
Microsoft · Productivity
Copilot inherits the user's existing permissions, so over-shared SharePoint/OneDrive content becomes far easier for employees to surface. That is an oversharing and governance risk rather than a training one.
Midjourney, Inc. · Image
All prompts and generated images are public by default and licensed for model training, and Stealth Mode (Pro/Mega only) merely hides outputs from the public gallery without exempting them from training, so confidential work-related content should not be used.
Notion Labs, Inc. · Productivity
Some AI features can optionally enable data-retaining LLMs via workspace settings, so an admin must confirm the workspace stays on zero/short-retention configurations.
Otter.ai, Inc. · Meetings & notetakers
Otter trains its own models on de-identified user content by default and its meeting assistant can auto-join calendar meetings, raising consent and surveillance concerns (it is the subject of a wiretap/consent class action).
Perplexity AI, Inc. · Search
On consumer plans data is used to improve models unless you turn off the default-on 'AI data retention' toggle, and reporting alleges Perplexity shared conversational data with ad/tracking platforms (incl. in Incognito).
Read AI, Inc. · Meetings & notetakers
The biggest gotcha is the auto-join bot behaviour. Read can be invited by any participant and join meetings automatically, so sensitive conversations may be silently recorded or transcribed unless hosts and participants actively remove it.
Salesforce · Productivity
The 'no training' guarantee covers generative LLMs, but Slack's non-generative machine-learning features have historically processed customer messages on an opt-out (not opt-in) basis, so admins must proactively review AI/ML data settings rather than assume default protection.
Synthesia Limited · Video
The main governance gotcha is consent provenance for AI avatars and voices. Synthesia requires documented consent for any likeness, so an at-work user must ensure they have rights to any face or voice they upload to create a custom avatar.
Zoom Communications, Inc. · Meetings & notetakers
AI Companion must process meeting audio/transcripts to function, and those inputs can be retained up to ~30 days for support/debugging, so disabling or admin-scoping the feature is the only way to keep sensitive conversations out of that processing pipeline.
About the directory
- How are the risk ratings calculated?
- Each tool is scored on the data exposure an employee creates by using its default or consumer tier at work: whether it trains on your inputs, retention, and whether it holds SOC 2, ISO 27001, a GDPR DPA, EU data residency, SSO and a HIPAA BAA. The score is transparent: every point is explained on the tool's page.
- Are these facts official?
- Yes. They are compiled from each vendor's privacy policy, DPA and trust centre, with source links on every tool page. Anything we could not verify is shown as Unverified rather than guessed.
- Which AI tools are safest for work?
- Tools that do not train on your data and hold SOC 2 or a GDPR DPA score lowest. On their business tiers, assistants like ChatGPT Enterprise, Claude for Work and Microsoft 365 Copilot rate well. Image tools that train on all inputs, such as Midjourney, rate highest-risk.